|
SPRING
2002

HOUSE
OF COMMONS REPORT

PAUL SZABO, C.A., M.P.
MEMBER
OF PARLIAMENT
MISSISSAUGA
SOUTH
|
Dear
Constituents,
I
hope that you and your family had a safe and enjoyable holiday season.
The time has passed quickly and there are a number of matters that
I wanted to bring to your attention in this report.
Our health
system continues to be the number one priority of Canadians and
much work is in process to ensure its long-term sustainability.
In the following pages, I have summarized some of those key activities
and I encourage you to provide your input on the future of health
care. (Cover picture is with Anne McLellan, the new Minister of
Health who had been the Justice Minister).
As part of
my work on the Transport Committee, we have been looking at airline
and airport safety issues. National security is very important and
we want to restore the confidence of the traveling public. In this
regard, much discussion has come up about citizenship and passports
and I have written a small section about the importance of being
a Canadian citizen.
This past
year, the subject of stem cell research has become a controversial
matter around the world. I am very interested in this subject and
I have just written a book - "The Ethics and Science of Stem
Cells" - which is intended to educate the public on the issue.
In this report, I have provided some details and information on
how you can get the book. Your views would be appreciated.
Also included
in this report is a feature on seniors and the Internet and one
on energy conservation tips. I hope you find this report informative
and, as always, I welcome your comments and suggestions.
Sincerely,
Paul Szabo
|
THE
FUTURE OF HEALTH CARE
|
Our
public health care system is a key defining element of who we are.
Canadians have worked hard to build it and we have the responsibility
to preserve it for the future. The Government of Canada is guided
by the spirit and principles of the Canada Health Act and its primary
role is to enforce those principles as the provinces and territories
delivery healthcare to Canadians.
The 5 principles
of the Canada Health Act are as follows:
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
- The provincial/territorial health plans must be administered and
operated on a non-profit basis, be run by provincial/territorial
governments and be subject to audits of their accounts and financial
transactions.
COMPREHENSIVENESS
- The health plan must pay for all medically necessary health services
provided by hospitals and medical practitioners according to provincial/territorial
law. Medically necessary services do not always include payment
for such costs as prescription drugs, optometry services, physiotherapy
and home care, and private ward accommodation in hospitals.
UNIVERSALITY
- All insured persons of the provinces or territories are entitled
to public health insurance coverage provided by each provincial
or territorial plan on uniform terms and conditions.
PORTABILITY
- Coverage under public health insurance must be maintained when
a resident moves or travels within Canada or travels outside the
country.
ACCESSIBILITY
- Everyone must have "reasonable access" to all medically
necessary hospital and physician services unimpeded by financial
or other barriers.
We have become
accustomed to a health system that offers a decent standard of care
to everyone regardless of economic or social status. Many see it
as our most important social institution which holds our country
together.
In the year
2000, the federal government spent $95 billion to support health
care. In addition, we spend about $30 billion a year through private
plans or out-of-pocket expenses to cover prescription drugs, dental
and vision care, long-term care and home care. Despite this level
of spending, the system has been struggling to deliver the kind
of health services Canadians expect and demand.
In September
2000, the federal and provincial governments reached an important
agreement to improve primary health care, to improve the management
of pharmaceuticals and to enhance the accountability to Canadians
on how health budgets are spent. All parties also reaffirmed their
support for the principles of the Canada Health Act.
In April 2001,
the government also appointed a Royal Commission on the Future of
Health Care in Canada which is being headed up by former premier
Roy Romanow. The work was split into two phases. The first phase
was fact finding which was completed on February 6, 2002 with the
presentation of an interim report "Shape the Future of Health
Care". That report is available on the internet at www.healthcarecommission.ca
or it can be ordered by calling 1-800-635-7943.
The Commission
found that the views expressed on how to address the challenges
confronting health care coalesced around four major perspectives
as follows:
MORE PUBLIC
INVESTMENT - Some suggest that the solution to the problems is to
put in more money. It is argued that in adding more resources, including
doctors, nurses and equipment will address the problems. The additional
funds would have to come from increased taxes and/or by reallocating
funds from other government programs.
SHARE COSTS
AND RESPONSIBILITIES - The second perspective is that our health
system will collapse under the weight of unsustainable costs due
to new technologies, new health problems, new expectations and improper
use. To address the costs, some suggest that Canadians bear a greater
responsibility through options such as co-payment fees, user fees,
taxable benefits or private insurance.
INCREASED PRIVATE
CHOICE - The third perspective is to allow Canadians increased choice
by allowing them access to private providers of health care services.
This the two-tier model which would allow the public to access private
for profit providers if they pay through there own resources or
insurance. It is argued that this would relieve pressure on the
public system.
REORGANIZE SERVICE
DELIVERY - The fourth perspective favours the fundamental reforming
of the delivery of health care with the ultimate objective of integrating
al services in a seamless manner. Advocates argue that the traditional
fee-for-service system for paying doctors is an outmoded concept
which often leads to inappropriate and more expensive care.
The objective
of the Commission is to accept and review on its merits any proposed
recommendation to strengthen the quality, effectiveness and continued
viability of Canada's Health Care System and to place it on a sustainable
footing. The perspectives above are the main approaches which will
be discussed with Canadians as phase two of the study. You are encouraged
to provide your views to the Commission who will provide their final
report to the Government in November 2002.
|
BECOMING
A CANADIAN CITIZEN
|
Those born in
Canada are automatically Canadian citizens whereas those who have
come to Canada retain their former citizenship or can chose to become
a Canadian citizen. All residents of Canada enjoy the protection
of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and are covered by our health
care and social services programs. Some may think there is no real
reason to become a Canadian citizen but there are some important
points to consider as follows:
- Only citizens
can vote in Federal and Provincial elections or run for elected
office in those elections. The quality of elected representatives
and government that we have is determined by citizens and therefore
it is an important right as well as a serious responsibility to
be valued and exercised. Citizenship entitles you to have a say
on how Canada is governed and on shaping the future of our country.
- Immigrants
who do not become Canadian citizens and who are convicted of a
criminal offence can be deported from Canada regardless of how
long they had lived in Canada.
- Citizens
are entitled to have a Canadian Passport which is one of the most
respected throughout the world. Canada is highly regarded internationally
and when you travel with a Canadian Passport, you enjoy the integrity
and respect that Canada has earned around the world.
Each year, hundreds
of thousands of people from around the world apply to come to Canada
to make a better life for themselves and their families. It normally
takes over 2 years to be assessed and large numbers of applicants
are not successful. Those who have been fortunate enough to be accepted
know how long the process took and how difficult it is to immigrate
to Canada. To subsequently become a citizen is the easy part.
To become a
Canadian citizen, you must:
- ·be
a permanent resident of Canada
- be at least
18 years of age
- be able to
read and write simple English or French or be able to understand
spoken English or French
- have lived
within Canada at least three years out of the four years right
before the day you apply
- learn about
Canada from the free publication "A Look At Canada"
and be able to answer questions on that information. Children
under 18 years of age do not write the citizenship test.
All adults and
children must have an application form and the fee is $200 for adults
and $100 for children. The process may take several months and once
your application is accepted you will receive the book "A Look
At Canada".
Once you have
met all the requirements for citizenship, those between the ages
of 18 and 59 will be scheduled for a test. Those under 18 or over
59 years of age are not required to take a test. You may be given
a written test but in many cases it is just an interview. The purpose
is to establish whether you know enough English or French and whether
you know the basic information in the booklet "A Look At Canada".
Once you have
met all the requirements, you will be sent a notice of your citizenship
ceremony. At that ceremony, you will take the oath of citizenship
and receive a citizenship card and certificate. I have been at many
of these citizenship ceremonies and these are wonderful family events
celebrating the great honour of becoming a Canadian citizen.
If you are not
a citizen yet, it is never too late. If you have any questions,
you can call a toll free number 1-888-242-2100. In my office, I
also have copies of the booklets "How To Become a Canadian
Citizen" and "A Look At Canada" for your information.
|
STEM
CELL RESEARCH CONTROVERSY
|
In April 2001,
the Government prepared draft legislation concerning Reproductive
Technologies and Related Research and asked the Health Committee
to hold public hearings. Those hearings concluded in December and
a report to the Minister of Health was tabled in the House of Commons.
The Bill proposes to ban or control a number of activities including
human cloning and genetic alteration. The report raised a number
of concerns about commercialization of technologies, surrogacy for
profit, in vitro fertilization and patenting of discoveries.
One of the most
controversial issues was the ethical question of permitting embryonic
stem cell research which uses stem cells from embryos but kills
the embryo. They also are subject to rejection by the immune system
and would require anti-rejection drugs for life and are very difficult
to control. Alternatively, stem cells also occur naturally in our
bodies and evidence is growing that they can be just as effective
in treating illness and disease. Since they come from the patient,
there is no problem with immune rejection and there is no ethical
controversy. It should also be noted that the United States has
decided not to fund research involving the destruction of embryos
and the Province of Quebec has totally banned embryonic stem cell
research. These are but a few of the considerations in the stem
cell debate.
It is not the
role of researchers to determine the ethical limits of their work.
That responsibility lies with the public and legislators but very
few Canadians know very much about the subject. In addition, research
has been advancing so rapidly that the ethically unacceptable is
coming into conflict with the scientifically possible. Therefore,
we need a sound regulatory environment to ensure that our ethical
and social values are respected by research.
I believe that
this issue is very important and that Canadians need to be consulted.
To inform MP's and the public at large, I have written a book entitled
"The Ethics and Science of Stem Cells". For your information,
I have reproduced the Introduction to the book on the next two pages.
Introduction
to "The Ethics and Science of Stem Cells"
Not long ago,
the term "genetic engineering" was known only in the mystical
research laboratories of the science community. Today, its use is
widespread in the context of the gateway to changing virtually every
aspect of human life. The frenzy among researchers is testament
to that potential and to why so many have characterized this risk-laden
quest for virtual immortality as the "Race of the Century."
A day does not
go by without another story about the hope and the potential of
stem cells. We have been told that if stem cells reach only their
lowest expectations, they will revolutionize health science more
than any other development in our history. However, the public and
the news media have an exaggerated and inaccurate perception of
where biomedicine is, and where it is going.
Most believe
that stem cells are already being used to cure a host of ills including
Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, diabetes and spinal cord injuries. That
simply is not the case. On January 15, 2002, the Harvard Medical
School announced that their latest research had shown that stem
cells relieved symptoms of Parkinson's disease in rats, but cautioned
that they could also cause tumours. If further experiments are successful,
it is expected that there could be human trials in about five years.
If we are still
five years away from human trials, and who knows how long before
therapies are approved for use, why has medical science raised expectations
with all the hype and hope rhetoric? If anything, it has distracted
attention away from some of the more controversial aspects of this
research. Stem cell research has raised some important social, moral
and ethical questions which have not received the same intensity
of exposure and discussion. Although that could elevate public apprehension,
as has occurred with genetically modified foods, it would clearly
put the onus on government to provide full information and the necessary
assurances.
If we pursue
genetic engineering, will we be able to control it to ensure that
it is safe and not exploited in unintended ways? Tragedies such
as thalidomide and its generation of limbless children remind us
that biomedical research is not infallible. Should we not expect
potential break-throughs to be approached with due caution and the
highest ethical standards under the scrutiny of a credible regulatory
framework?
Illness, disease
and death are parts of life that impact a society in many ways.
Our challenge is therefore to find a balance between the ability
of medical science to enhance our lives with the need to protect
our individual and collective interests.
The objective
of this book is to provide a foundation of information on what has
arguably become the debate of the millennium. It looks at the complexities
of procreation; explains the science of stem cells; highlights what
research has been done to date; and presents the related moral and
ethical concerns. It also summarizes U.S. and other international
developments and examines Canada's long road to legislation.
Now legislatures
and the public must take up the debate to determine the ethical
limits to research and the application of genetic knowledge to the
delivery of public health.
End of Introduction
The Minister
of Health has 150 days to table a response to the Health Committee
Report and it will undoubtedly result in a wide-ranging debate on
where we go from here. I have publicly supported a moratorium on
embryonic stem cell research until medical science has exhausted
the potential of adult stem cells. Many researchers believe that
adult stem cells can treat every practical health application necessary.
My book has
been given to every Parliamentarian and has been widely circulated
to the media, health professionals and Provincial Health authorities.
It is also available to the public, in both official languages,
from my office and can be viewed my Web site www.paulszabo.com.
Your input would be appreciated.
|
INTERNET
SITES FOR SENIORS
|
During your
life, some of your priorities stay the same and others change over
time. We all value our health care system and we want to be sure
that it is there for us when we need it. After health care, students,
young adults, families and seniors all have slightly different priorities
and lifestyles. We now live longer and we have longer retirements
than ever before. These days, the golden years also seem to start
at age 50. Becoming a senior may be the end of some activities but
it is also the beginning of a whole new set of challenges and opportunities.
Travel, relaxing
pastimes, changes in general health, retirement finances, living
arrangements and grand parenting are just a few thoughts that come
to mind. Fortunately, there are many well-established groups and
organizations dedicated to the interests of seniors. The internet
has also become a great source of information and assistance. Here
are just a few sites which may be of interest:
Most of these
sites also have other suggested sites which may be of interest.
Seniors have become one of the largest user groups of the internet
and email and it is never too late to start.
ENERGY CONSERVATION TIPS
Gases in our
atmosphere such as water vapour, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous
oxide act like a greenhouse to keep the sun's heat in and make our
planet livable. Without this natural greenhouse effect, the average
temperature on earth would be 18 degrees below zero - too cold to
support life.
However, too
many greenhouse gases can be harmful. As we burn more and more fossil
fuels to power our cars, keep our industries humming and make our
homes more comfortable, we are increasing concentrations of greenhouse
gases in our atmosphere. These gases are thickening the blanket
that insulates the Earth, causing average temperatures to rise.
In addition to causing more severe weather events, this global warming
is making air pollution worse. Top climate scientists have concluded
that most of the warming over the last 50 years is attributable
to human activity. If we really care about the quality of our air
and water, we all can be part of the solution by following a few
tips:
- Always turn
off lights and other appliances when they are not in use. As energy
cost rise, you can save money and help the environment at the
same time.
- Adjust your
home heating for different times of the day. If you are relaxing
around the house 21 degrees celsius is recommended. Drop that
to 20 degrees when you are working around the house, 18 degrees
when you are sleeping and 16 degrees when you are away from home.
- Wash your
laundry in cold water. It does just as good a job and saves a
considerable amount of energy.
- Take short
showers instead of baths. A five-minute shower uses about half
as much water as a bath.
- Replace incandescent
bulbs with energy-efficient compact fluorescents which are four
times more efficient and last about eight times as long.
- If you cannot
find compact fluorescents, control the intensity of your incandescents
with dimmer switches. A bulb dimmed by 25% uses 10% less energy.
- Use curtains
or blinds to control the heat. Open them up to let the sun in
and close them at night to reduce heat loss through the windows.
- Use low-flow
showerheads and save as much as 15% of your home's hot water usage.
Aerators on sink faucets can also reduce the water used for hand
washing by about 40%.
- When possible,
use small appliances such as microwaves or toaster ovens rather
than using the range.
- Take clothes
out of the dryer promptly and fold or hang them up to reduce or
prevent wrinkling. Your iron uses a lot of energy.
Needlessly idling
our cars also has an impact on air quality.
- Today's
modern car engines only need about 30 seconds of idling even on
winter days before you drive away. The best way to warm up a car
is to drive it. Also avoid using remote car starters.
- Excessive
idling can actually damage your engine components. Turn off your
car if you are parked for more than 10 seconds. Component wear
caused by frequent restarting is estimated to cost about $10 per
year but this would be recovered several times over in fuel savings
from reduced idling. More than 10 seconds of idling uses more
fuel than restarting the engine.
Studies suggest
that Canadians voluntarily idle their vehicles for a combined total
of 75 million minutes a day or the equivalent of one car idling
for about 144 years. On average, we idle our cars about 5 to 10
minutes each day. If every driver of a light duty vehicle in Canada
avoided idling for just 5 minutes per day, we would save 1.6 million
litres of fuel and would prevent more than 3,800 tonnes of carbon
dioxide, a greenhouse gas, from entering the atmosphere. Small things
really can make a world of difference.
OTTAWA
OFFICE MISSISSAUGA OFFICE
Room 175 1684
Lakeshore Road West
Confederation
Building Unit 20
House of Commons
Mississauga, Ontario
Ottawa,
Ontario K1A 0A6 L5J 1J5
Telephone:
613-992-4848 905-822-2111
Fax:
613-996-3267 905-822-2115
Email:
szabop@parl.gc.ca szabop1@parl.gc.ca
Visit
us on the Internet: www.paulszabo.com
Special personal
messages of congratulations may be requested for those Birthdays
and Anniversaries listed below. As these events are very important
occasions, you may want to request a message, when applicable, from
Her Majesty The Queen, the Governor General and the Prime Minister
of Canada.
Greetings from
Her Majesty the Queen are available for 100th Birthdays and every
5th year thereafter, and 60th Wedding Anniversaries and every 5th
year thereafter. Please note that copies of birth certificates and
marriage certificates are required by Government House for messages
from The Queen.
Birthdays
75th and over
- message from the Prime Minister
90th - 99th
- message from the Governor General
100th and over
- message from Her Majesty The Queen (copy of birth certificate
required)
Wedding
Anniversaries
25th
and over - message from the Prime Minister
50th
- 59th - message from the Governor General
60th
and over - message from Her Majesty The Queen (copy of marriage
certificate required)
Please
complete this form to inform us of the occasion and return it postage
free to my Constituency Office.
OTTAWA
OFFICE
Room 175
Confederation Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
Tel: 613-992-4848
Fax: 613-996-3267
Email: szabop@parl.gc.ca
|
MISSISSAUGA
OFFICE
1684 Lakeshore Road West
Unit 20
Mississauga, Ontario
L5J 1J5
Tel: 905-822-2111
Fax: 905-822-2115
Email: szabop1@parl.gc.ca
|
Visit
us on the Internet: www.paulszabo.com
Mississauga Office Hours: Monday to Friday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Appointments
can be scheduled during office hours or other arrangements can be
made by calling the office.
Constituents
may write to any Member of Parliament or Cabinet Minister postage
free. Simply address your envelope to the particular Member, c/o
House of Commons, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6. Your views and suggestions
are important.
|
VISITING
OTTAWA
Any groups
or individuals planning to visit Ottawa who wish to attend
Question Period or have a tour of the House of Commons may
contact my office. We will be pleased to make the necessary
arrangements.
As well,
if you are interested in obtaining information regarding parliamentary
debates, the House of Commons, the Senate, student information
kits, federal government departments, or Ottawa tourism, please
call my office.
|
|