| Summer
2006

HOUSE
OF COMMONS REPORT

PAUL SZABO, C.A., M.P.
MEMBER
OF PARLIAMENT
MISSISSAUGA
SOUTH |
Dear Constituents,
Parliament
has been sitting since April 4th and my workload has been very heavy
having taken on a number of new responsibilities. Being an Opposition
Member is a whole new experience because the onus is now on you
to hold the government accountable for its action or inaction.
The new
Government has introduced a Budget and some Bills to implement its
plans and some to reintroduce legislation which was not completed
in the last Parliament. There are some matters which cause me some
concern already, such as the withdrawal of Canadian support for
the Kyoto Accord to address climate change. There seems to be a
pattern of decisions which I can only describe as the Americanization
of Canada.
As well,
the Government has been reluctant to respect the decisions of Parliament.
In a minority situation, the Government needs the support of other
Parties to win votes but has been all to willing to threaten to
call an election if they do not get their way. The last minority
government lasted only 18 months and although Canadians do not want
another election soon, it appears that the current Government is
looking for another election as soon as they think they might win
a majority. Hopefully common sense will prevail and the Government
will try to make Parliament work.
On the cover,
I am pictured with Tom Wilkinson and his adoptive mother. There
is a story inside about “Tom’s Walk”.
I hope that
you and your family have an enjoyable summer season and as always,
I welcome your questions and comments on matters of importance to
you.
Sincerely,
Paul Szabo
After
millions of years of remaining constant, greenhouse gas levels,
particularly CO2, started to climb sharply at the beginning of the
industrial revolution. They are now almost certainly higher than
they have been in 20 million years. This is not a natural fluctuation.
It is a side effect of us humans diligently burning the oil, coal
and forests. These greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere,
much like a giant greenhouse. The heating is called global warming.
Global warming
has already reduced the depth of the winter polar ice cap since
the 1970s by 40%. Polar bears will become extinct if the ice retreat
continues. 90% of all glaciers on the planet have retreated significantly
in the last 50 years. As the white reflective snow melts, it leaves
behind the darker earth which is even more efficient at absorbing
solar energy. This causes an acceleration of the heating effect.
So what? Who
likes snow and ice? Consider:
- The computer
models show up to a metre sea level rise over the next 100 years.
- More heat
means more energy in the atmosphere. This means more turbulent
weather. Super hurricanes will cause millions in property damage.
- More heat
means a redistribution of rain patterns. We are now seeing freakish
storms all over the world that dump many feet of water in a single
day where previously even an inch would have been considered a
major downpour. This also means droughts in places that previously
had abundant rainfall. For the first time in history, Canada had
to import grain because of droughts. For the first time in history,
rainy Vancouver's drinking water reservoirs were almost empty.
Wouldn't it
be nice to live in a warmer climate? There are at least three drawbacks:
- You may find
you have to run your air conditioner year round. Where are we
going to get all the extra electricity to run the air conditioners?
By the law of supply and demand, electricity prices will go through
the roof, and you may find yourself unable to afford to run your
air conditioner.
- With higher
temperatures, water evaporates more quickly. Global warming disrupts
rainfall patterns bringing extra rain to some places and drought
to others. For those in drought, tap water will have to be brought
in from further and further away. This means higher water bills.
It also means skyrocketing food costs since the farmers need huge
amounts of water for irrigation. Every degree rise requires 10%
more water just to break even.
- If you live
in Alberta or Saskatchewan or in the Ganges river valley, your
tap water comes from glacier meltwater. Those regions will experience
summer water shortages.
- The trees
can't pack up and move to a cooler climate. We lost many of our
grand fir trees in the summer of 2002 due to heat and drought.
You would pretty well have to cut them down and replant with new
heat-tolerant, drought-tolerant species. It will take a generation
for the newly planted forests to mature.
The Kyoto Protocol
is an agreement under which industrialized countries will reduce
their collective emissions of greenhouse gases by 5.2% compared
to the year 1990 (but note that, compared to the emissions levels
that would be expected by 2010 without the Protocol, this target
represents a 29% cut). The goal is to lower overall emissions of
six greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulfur
hexafluoride, HFCs, and PFCs - calculated as an average over the
five-year period of 2008-12. National targets range from 8% reductions
for the European Union to permitted increases of 8% for Australia.
Other countries, like India and China, which have ratified the protocol,
are not required to reduce carbon emissions under the present agreement.
The objective
is the "stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the
atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous interference
with the climate system"
The treaty was
negotiated in Kyoto, Japan in December 1997, opened for signature
on March 16, 1998, and closed on March 15, 1999. The agreement came
into force on February 16, 2005. As of April 2006, a total of 163
countries have ratified the agreement representing over 61.6% of
emissions.
On December
17, 2002, Canada ratified the treaty. While numerous polls have
shown support for the Kyoto protocol around 70%, there is still
some opposition, particularly by some business groups, non-governmental
climate scientists and energy concerns, using arguments similar
to those being used in the US. There is also a fear that since US
companies will not be affected by the Kyoto Protocol that Canadian
companies will be at a disadvantage in terms of trade.
In 2005, the
result was limited to an ongoing "war of words", primarily
between the government of Alberta (Canada's primary oil and gas
producer) and the federal government. There are even fears that
Kyoto could threaten national unity, especially in Alberta.
After the January
2006 election, the Conservative Party minority government expressed
opposition to Kyoto and announced that Canada would have no chance
of meeting its targets under Kyoto, and would instead look to participate
in U.S. sponsored Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development
and Climate. "We've been looking at the Asia-Pacific Partnership
for a number of months now because the key principles around [it]
are very much in line with where our government wants to go.”
On May 2, 2006,
it was reported that environmental funding designed to meet the
Kyoto standards has been cut. The One-Tonne Challenge (to educate
the public on how they can help) and Energuide (subsidies for making
homes more energy efficient) programs have both been cancelled.
In late May, the Government instructed its negotiators at the Kyoto
meetings in Germany that Canada no longer supports the current agreement.
These developments
are very disturbing and represent a total rejection of the International
concerns about the urgency to address global warming. The pressure
from the US on many fronts and the reluctance of the government
to deal with the large emitters particularly in the oil and gas
sectors in Alberta seem to indicate that political priorities rank
ahead of the priorities of Canadians.
Over the past
12 years, I have taken a special interest in what was then called
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS). It is now called Fetal Alcohol Spectrum
of Disorders (FASD) because there is a range of physical and mental
health damage that could result. This is an incurable but preventable
condition which involves brain damage caused by alcohol consumed
by the mother during pregnancy.
The alcohol
in beer, wine or liquor is ethanol which is a poison. Once ingested,
the ethanol gets into the blood stream of the fetus and because
the fetal liver is so poorly developed, it takes about 4 times longer
for the alcohol to be metabolized (broken down) than it would for
the mother. Even though the mother may feel fine, the ethanol continues
to dissolve the brain cells of the child and cause neurological
damage and physical deformities.
In fact, maternal
consumption of alcohol during pregnancy is the leading known cause
of mental retardation in Canada. It is also estimated that as much
as 50% of the inmates in the jails of Canada suffer from FASD.
Individuals
with FASD live with attention and memory deficits, hyperactivity
and poor impulse control. As a result, adults with FASD have difficulty
maintaining successful independence. They have trouble in school,
keeping jobs or sustaining healthy relationships.
The most vulnerable
period for the unborn child is days 15 to 22 of pregnancy. Since
most women do not know they are pregnant at this time, it is not
adequate to say that if you are pregnant, you should abstain from
alcohol. Therefore, if pregnancy is possible - you are in your birthing
years, sexually active and not using protection, the best advice
is abstain from alcohol to eliminate the risk of permanently damaging
your unborn child.
On May 9th, I had the pleasure of welcoming Tom Wilkinson and Mrs.
Jill Dockrill, his adoptive mother, to my office on Parliament Hill.
Diagnosed with FASD, 28 year old Tom has just completed, for the
second time, an 812 kilometre walk from Windsor to Ottawa to promote
public awareness of FASD and to raise funds for public education
information to be produced and distributed. During his courageous
walk, Tom and his dog, Shadow, visited 23 cities and met with city
officials to share his message.
On May 10th,
Tom and his mother were invited to sit in the front row of the Speaker’s
Gallery inside the House of Commons to be recognized and thanked
by the Members of Parliament. The following is a transcript of my
statement in the House:
Mr.
Paul Szabo (Mississauga South, Lib.):
Hansard May 10. 2006
“Mr. Speaker,
maternal consumption of alcohol during pregnancy is the leading
known cause of mental illness in Canada. Fetal alcohol syndrome
and other alcohol related birth defects are incurable but are 100%
preventable.
Today a young
man, Tom Wilkinson, is visiting Parliament Hill. Tom suffers from
fetal alcohol syndrome. He and his dog, Shadow, just completed an
812 kilometre walk from Windsor, Ontario to Ottawa to promote public
awareness of the risks associated with alcohol consumption, especially
during the early stages of pregnancy. Having shared his message
with 23 cities during his walk, Tom has done his part.
Today I call
upon the national media to do its part and to share Tom's story
and message with the people of Canada. I am also sure that all hon.
members will want to rise to join me today in acknowledging Tom
Wilkinson for his courageous initiative to prevent fetal alcohol
syndrome.
We thank Tom.
We are all very proud of him.”
In
recent weeks, we have heard and read a lot about avian influenza,
or bird flu, and pandemic influenza. Three types of influenza are
currently in the news: human influenza, avian influenza and pandemic
influenza.
Human influenza,
or the flu, is a respiratory infection caused by the influenza virus.
Strains circulate every year, making people sick. Most people will
recover from influenza within a week or ten days, but some including
those over 65 and adults and children with chronic conditions, such
as diabetes and cancer are at greater risk of more severe complications,
such as pneumonia. Between 4,000 and 8,000 Canadians can die annually
of influenza and its complications depending on the severity of
the season.
What
is avian influenza or "bird flu"?
Birds and other animals, including pigs, also contract and transmit
influenza. Wild birds, in particular, are natural carriers of influenza
A viruses. They have carried animal influenza viruses, with no apparent
harm, for centuries. Migratory waterfowl (ducks, geese) are known
to carry viruses of the H5 and H7 strains or subtypes.
Currently, avian
influenza H5N1 is circulating in South East Asian and parts of Europe,
infecting many poultry populations and some humans. This strain
is highly pathogenic, or highly deadly to birds, and has infected
a limited number of people. There is no evidence this virus is transmitted
from person to person.
Why
is bird flu a concern for people?
People are exposed to different strains of influenza many times
during their lives. Even though the virus changes, their previous
bouts of influenza may offer some protection against similar strains
of the virus. However, three to four times each century, for unknown
reasons, a radical change takes place in the influenza A virus causing
a new strain to emerge.
One way this
radical change can happen is that a person sick with a human influenza
virus also becomes infected with the avian influenza virus and the
two viruses re assort or "mix." This means that the avian
influenza virus acquires some of the human influenza genes, potentially
creating a new type of the influenza A virus that people would have
no immunity against. If the virus was easily passed to and among
people, this would create the conditions for an influenza pandemic.
There is no
pandernic influenza at this time anywhere in the world. However,
there were three influenza pandernics in the last century and scientists
recognize that another is inevitable. That is why governments are
planning to prepare to respond to a possible influenza pandemic.
What
is the Government of Canada doing to prepare?
Canada has a plan for responding to an influenza pandemic. The Canadian
Pandemic Influenza Plan was released in February 2004 and outlines
actions to be taken by the various levels of government so that
a coordinated response that protects the health of Canadians is
implemented in the event of a pandemic. Specifically, it outlines
measures to curb infectious disease outbreaks, such as vaccine and
antiviral strategies, surveillance, communication and emergency
response.
The Public Health
Agency of Canada continually monitors for new influenza viruses
and will adapt and revise the Plan as new knowledge becomes available.
At the same time, the Agency is working closely with the provinces
and territories in the development of their readiness plans and
serves a leadership role in supporting the work of other countries
in this area.
Are
vaccines and antivirals available to Canadians?
Vaccines and antivirals are two components of Canada's approach
to pandemic preparedness. A pandemic vaccine cannot be developed
until the new virus emerges. After the strain has emerged and has
been identified, it will take about six months to develop and produce
an influenza vaccine. Therefore, a vaccine would not be available
at the start of a pandernic and may be in short supply during the
initial stages.
Canada has a
contract with a domestic supplier for the production of a pandemic
vaccine. This helps us get ready in advance so we have everything
needed to produce the vaccine before a influenza pandemic virus
emerges.
Until a vaccine
is available, however, antivirals will be an important part of our
response to a pandemic. An antiviral is medicine that destroys a
virus or interferes with its ability to grow and reproduce. It is
usually given to patients in pill form once they are sick to reduce
symptoms, shorten the length of illness and minimize serious complications.
Antivirals do not provide immunity. When antivirals are used for
prevention, the dose is much higher and has to be taken for as long
as people are exposed to the virus.
Combined, federal,
provincial and territorial governments currently own 35 million
capsules of oseltamivir, with another five million on order.
Antivirals,
however, are limited in their effectiveness and, therefore, are
only one part of our overall strategy. They alone cannot be relied
on to reduce the impact.
What
can individuals do to protect themselves?
If you are travelling to a foreign destination, you should check
Health Canada’s web site at www.travelhealth.gc.ca
for advice.
Prevention is
the best defence against any strain of influenza. Besides getting
the annual flu vaccine, basic personal hygiene will help ward off
sickness. The influenza virus spreads through droplets that have
been coughed or sneezed into the air by someone who has the flu.
So use a tissue, or cough into your sleeve, to avoid infecting those
around you.
The flu virus
is also found on the hands of people with the flu and on surfaces
they have touched. You can become infected if you shake hands with
infected persons or touch contaminated surfaces and transfer the
virus to your own eyes, nose or mouth. Frequent hand washing with
soap and water is the best way to prevent spreading the germs to
others.
| HOME
MAINTENANCE AND SAFETY |
Every Spring
and Summer, we all should take the time to check out our homes to
see what might need to be done to keep them safe and in good repair.
Here are a few tips from the insurance industry:
- Replace your
furnace filter
- Clean kitchen
exhaust hood and filter
- Make sure
you have a working multi-purpose fire extinguisher
- Review your
fire escape plan with your family
- Consider
installing a lighting protection system on your home
- Have an
air conditioning contractor inspect and maintain your system as
recommended by the manufacturer
- Have your
roof inspected for potential leaks
- Repair all
cracked or uneven driveways and walkways to provide a level walking
surface
- Check all
fascia and trim for deterioration
- Check your
water heater
- Check the
shutoff valve at each plumbing fixture
- Clean clothes
dryer duct, damper and space under the dryer
- Replace
extension cords which have become brittle or damaged
- Inspect
and clean dust from the covers of your smoke alarms and carbon
monoxide alarms
- Secure your
home when away on trips or vacation and arrange for someone to
pick up mail and cut the grass
- Check all
recreational equipment for proper maintenance
- Check you
wood deck or concrete patio for deterioration
- Make sure
there are working night lights at the top and bottom of all stairs
- Check exterior
siding
- Check all
window and door locks for proper operation
- Check your
home for potential water leaks
- Check water
hoses for clothes washer, refrigerator, icemaker and dishwasher
for cracks and bubbles
- Check the
garage door cables and tracks for wear or adjustment
Part of the
Federal Accountability Act was to establish the Public Appointments
Commission to oversee the appointment of persons to hundreds of
full and part time positions on Government Boards, Agencies and
Crown Corporations. These include such positions as Directors, Chair
of the Board and President of organizations such as Canada Post,
Via Rail and the Canadian Mint. Needless to say these are important
jobs and should be filled by well-qualified persons.
Treasury Board
is part of the Cabinet of Government and it is their job to establish
guidelines for the process. As a past Chair of the House of Commons
Standing Committee on Government Operations and estimates, I had
been very involved in the development of the process. It involves
the publication of the position opening in National newspapers,
the review of credentials by a recruitment firm and the scrutiny
by a Committee of Parliament. Ultimately, it is the Government who
reviews the available candidates and nominates its choice.
From a public
perspective, there has always been the view that former politicians,
or persons very involved in a political party who get such appointments
are actually getting paid back or rewarded for past activity. This
is commonly referred to as patronage. Despite their qualifications,
it is usually a rough ride whenever this happens.
The Conservative
Government said they wanted to address the patronage process and
proposed to establish a Public Appointments Commission. As a starting
point, the Prime Minister nominated Mr. Gwyn Morgan to head the
Commission. There was no advertising or recruitment process and
although Mr. Morgan was a successful Calgary oilman, he was also
a major fundraiser for the Conservative Party. At this point, the
public becomes annoyed.
Needless to say, the nomination flew directly in the face of the
Federal Accountability Act. Public Appointments were supposed to
be made in accordance with a strict process to demonstrate transparency
and accountability.
Whenever an
opposition party starts to question the appropriateness or suitability
of an appointment, they tend to do a little extra research to find
out whether there is any background information which may reflect
on the suitability of a candidate. It did not take much digging
to find that Mr. Morgan had made some questionable remarks in public
forums.
During a February
speech in Toronto, Mr. Morgan had said that multiculturalism could
work to divide Canadians. Using France and Australia as examples,
he said: “It seems as if multiculturalism in these countries
has created subcultures bearing little relation to the mainstream
culture and values of the Country.”
In December,
he linked rising gang violence in Canada to immigrants from Jamaica
and Indo-China. Those cultures are “dominated by violence
and lawlessness,” he said. On May 16th, Mr. Morgan appeared
before the Government Operations Committee who was asked to review
his appointment and provide comment. They do not have the authority
to reject the appointment. Mr. Morgan was not so much questioned
on his abilities to do the job but rather on his suitability for
the job.
When asked about
his comments about multiculturalism, immigrants, unions and the
poor in our society, he admitted that he would have re-written the
speeches to be more careful. The Committee voted to report their
opinion that Mr. Morgan was not suitable for this important position.
Not only did the Prime Minister withdraw his nomination, but he
scrapped the whole Commission saying he would have to wait until
he had a majority government. Surely there must be other qualified
Canadians.
OTTAWA
OFFICE
Room 175
Confederation Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
Tel: 613-992-4848
Fax: 613-996-3267
Email: szabop@parl.gc.ca
|
MISSISSAUGA
OFFICE
1684 Lakeshore Road West
Unit 20
Mississauga, Ontario
L5J 1J5
Tel: 905-822-2111
Fax: 905-822-2115
Email: szabop1@parl.gc.ca
|
Visit
us on the Internet: www.paulszabo.com
Mississauga Office Hours: Monday to Friday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Appointments
can be scheduled during office hours or other arrangements can be
made by calling the office.
Constituents
may write to any Member of Parliament or Cabinet Minister postage
free. Simply address your envelope to the particular Member, c/o
House of Commons, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6. Your views and suggestions
are important.
| VISITING
OTTAWA
Any groups
or individuals planning to visit Ottawa who wish to attend
Question Period or have a tour of the House of Commons may
contact my office. We will be pleased to make the necessary
arrangements.
As well,
if you are interested in obtaining information regarding parliamentary
debates, the House of Commons, the Senate, student information
kits, federal government departments, or Ottawa tourism, please
call my office. |
|